Shutterfly, the photoways-like of the US, reported their Q4 earnings last week and that relieved every one, including me !
Shutterfly went public last september but the IPO had barely been a success since then, with the stock gradually lowering from $15 the first day down to around $13 early February.
They had lost money for the first 3 quarters of fiscal '06, growth was in the 30% area only (vs 45% for Netflix or 70% for VistaPrint)...and then came the Q4 report :
- A 60% revenue growth year-over-year, far greater than during previous quarters, shows how its model has evolved into a true gift model, with consumers massively buying cards, calendars and books to make presents during the greetings season. All told, Q4 revenues represent 53% of yearly sales ($123M).
- Very high profitability that more than compensates for the first 3 quarters losses. Indeed, a $22.9M EBITDA out of $65.7M is rather nice !
Shutterfly eventually proves that the online printing segment, despite a strong price pressure and commoditization of basic 4x6 porints, can be a profitable one : with a premium brand which attracts customers, a true customer-centric approach (at every level) which ensures they are satisfied, and exciting innovations that delight them and increase margins, it does pay off !
I'm now out of Photoways to build up a new Group based on an innovative approach in e-commerce (the Ushuaia Project), and I'm glad that my remaining shares, which I mostly want to sell along with my partner Martin Genot, ex Photoways COO, have a very significant value, thanks in part to Shutterfly !
Again, I don't understand why Photoways doesn't launch a product/service like Moo.com .
Posted by: J. | February 26, 2007 at 02:04 PM
So, what is Moo doing exactly ? (by the way, we share one common shareholder, index)
Posted by: Michel de Guilhermier | February 26, 2007 at 08:24 PM
http://the-accelerator.blogspot.com/
3rd and 8th posts.
Posted by: J. | February 26, 2007 at 10:30 PM
Many companies share one common investor (calPERS etc), so what?
Posted by: J. | February 27, 2007 at 11:50 AM
so nothing !
Posted by: Michel de Guilhermier | February 27, 2007 at 06:05 PM
ok, I understand...nothing;)
Posted by: J. | February 27, 2007 at 09:30 PM