My Photo

January 2022

Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun
          1 2
3 4 5 6 7 8 9
10 11 12 13 14 15 16
17 18 19 20 21 22 23
24 25 26 27 28 29 30
31            

Categories

Blog powered by Typepad

Google

« The Real Cancer of France : the Mentality ! | Main | It's so Costly to be a Star ! »

February 22, 2007

Comments

The price paid is still a bit high. You don't mention it, but an EBITDA of 13 looks a bit excessive: it's the highest transaction multiple of the last decade in the food retail business.

Furthermore, WFMI now has debt and consequently faces a higher risk in case of a market downturn.

Last but not least, Wild Oats stores are very small compared to Whole Foods ones. So the acquisition urges a strategic shift by WFMI: from superstores to just stores (less profitable).

Needless to say, I wasn't buyoant reading the news this morning...

Well Jeremy, I think you are making a mistake !

First, OATS EBITDA is $51M, so that's a bit less than 11 times.

Still, this is quite pricey, but bear in mind 3 things about retail :

- What matters foremost in physical retail is location.
- A superior concept yields more revenue per square foot
- Purchasing and logistics costs come down with volume.

WFMI is basically acquiring 110 new locations which, thanks to its superior merchandising/premium products, will later yield significantly more $ per square foot than what they do today with the present OATS merchandising.

I think it's reasonnable to estimate that WFMI has the potential to raise revenues per square foot in the OATS stores (which are all going to be rebranded) by at least 50%. This should in turn probably double the EBITDA of OATS.

Furthermore, $1.2bn additional top line revenues will drive purchasing costs down and improve logistics efficiency throughout the system.

All told, I believe this $545M acquisition should create at very least twice as much value for WFMI.

The 12% stock price increase of WFMI yesterday is logical !

However, I must add that I was more concerned with the earnings report than the price paid for OATS.

There appears to be pressure on prices and margins, and this will undoubtely impact the bottom line of the combined company.

In the same time, by getting bigger they will lower purchasing cost down and somewhat offset potential lower pricing.

I'm sorry Michel, but the transaction will occur in the $565m range and Oats' EBITDA amounts to $40,86m. 586/40,86 = 13,82.

I couldn't agree more on the purchasing economies of scale; however, I can only express doubts regarding logistics. Transportation costs aren't so much likely to go down as Oats' stores are remote from WFMI ones. As for the supply chain system, true efficiency should theoretically improve. However, practically speaking, and I'm certain you have at some point experienced it growing Photoways (I'm just guessing), the entire supply chain may get more complex. So the system will have to be updated, which requires IT investments.

Last but not least, true WFMI's concept is great. But Oaks' concept is different: smaller stores and hence lower revenues/store and profit margins impacted (lower bargaining power with suppliers).

So let's watch and see what the management of Whole Foods does with Wild Oats. It should be quite interesting and pretty quick to come in the news.

"586/40,86 = 13,82" sorry for the typo; should've been "565/40,86 = 13,82" but I'm sure you would've corrected yourselves.

Source for OATS' EBITDA, Dow Jones Market Watch: http://www.marketwatch.com/tools/quotes/profile.asp?symb=OATS&sid=17938&dist=TQP_Nav_profile

Hi Jeremy,

As for OATS EBITDA, I refered to Yahoo Finance. One source should more accurate than the other, but I can't tell which one !

Anyway, more interesting are the fondamentals.

A agree for logistics, only minor gains have to be expected. They will mostly be on OATS bottom line as I'm sure WFMI has the potential to improve it. You are also reight to pinpoint the systems upgrade you also have to make. Possible that WFMI has to make them (but not sure, I don't know the exact status of their IT systems).

Though OATS store are different with lower revenues/sq ft, I for my part bet this is where will come most of the gains. OATS stores will not reach the sq ft rev of WFMI as there's a retail law : the bigger the store the bigger the rev/sq ft (for a given concept). That's why I capped at +50%.

But WFMI's superior merchandising and premium products will undoubtely make a key difference.

And you also have a better purchasing power now with 20% more revenues (which can become 40%).

Bottom line for me is that Wild Oats locations, once they have WFMI merchandising, will either upsell ex OATS shoppers or will attract new upmarket ones.

I've just read that John Mackey, WFMI CEO, had dec in declared that it anticipated sales up by 50 to 70% in some locations, higher that what what I assumed.

OATS was a laggard and I have no doubt WFMI superior management and merchandising will make a big difference. I have already seen that in other environements.

However, again, there's these days a global price pressure on the natural and organic food retail market, so I'm just midly bullish on WFMI for the short term.

Long term, not a single concern !

I can find the prayer I want. I thank God for this website.

You guys do a wonderful job! Keep up the good work!!!

Fascinating site and well worth the visit. I will be back1

Dear web-master ! I looked your site and I want to say that yor very well

The comments to this entry are closed.

Twitter Michel de Guilhermier

Twitter Day One Entrepreneurs & Partners

Twitter Updates

    follow me on Twitter

    Categories